Streams of WikiLeaks

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Questions?
  • Submissions?

How we know Bradley Manning is a UK citizen « UK Friends of Bradley Manning

How we know Bradley Manning is a UK citizen

with 20 comments

This is an important blog post. Please distribute it widely.

My legal information is sourced from the UK Border Agency, specifically their caseworking instructions for all issues arising under The British Nationality Act of 1981. This piece of legislation has formed the basis of British nationality law since coming into force on 1 January 1983 and the caseworking instructions derived from it are the guidelines Border Agency employees refer to on a day-to-day basis when deciding who is entitled to British citizenship. This is an absolutely authoritative source.

Bradley Manning is a UK citizen by virtue of his mother’s nationality. He holds both US and UK citizenship.

Bradley Manning was born in the United States on 17 December 1987, the son of Brian and Susan Manning. As the son of an American father, born on US soil, Bradley Manning has held US citizenship since birth.

Bradley’s parents met in Wales and Susan Manning has been described as ‘Welsh’ or hailing from Wales repeatedly in the mainstream media, including outlets with self-proclaimed fact-checking operations.

Susan Manning is, beyond any reasonable doubt, a UK citizen.  As far as we know she was born in the UK and is therefore not a “UK citizen by descent”. In law she is a UK citizen “otherwise than by descent”.

I would now like to refer you to Chapter 20 of the caseworking instructions for the Nationality Act of 1981. This is, remember, the working reference guide that British civil servants use every day to determine who qualifies for UK citizenship. Chapter 20 explains what rules govern the transmission of UK citizenship to children born abroad and is the crucial reference that resolves the issue of Bradley Manning’s citizenship status. We will take this step-by-step to avoid any possible confusion.

20.1.1 Every person who is a British citizen is so either “by descent” or “otherwise
than by descent”.

20.1.2 The distinction between the two affects a British citizen’s ability to transmit
that citizenship to children born abroad. It does not affect any of the other
rights or duties that go with British citizenship.

20.1.3 British citizens by descent cannot transmit their citizenship to children born
abroad except in the circumstances described in Chapter 4. British citizens
otherwise than by descent automatically transmit their citizenship to children
born abroad.

20.1.4 As a general principle, people are British citizens otherwise than by descent
if they are British citizens:
• by birth, adoption, registration or naturalisation in the United Kingdom
or the Falkland Islands before 21 May 2002; or…

My working assumption is that Susan Manning was born in the United Kingdom. Hence she is a British citizen otherwise than by descent (20.1.4) and “British citizens otherwise than by descent automatically transmit their citizenship to children born abroad.” (20.1.3)

20.1.5 People who are British citizens by birth or other means elsewhere are British
citizens by descent.

A child born to a British citizen outside the UK or its overseas territories is a British citizen by descent. Bradley Manning is therefore a British citizen by descent. (20.1.5)

The issue of Bradley Manning’s dual citizenship has been the subject of some controversy and much disinformation but the situation is in fact straightforward: unless Bradley’s mother was born outside the UK, her son has also been a UK citizen automatically since birth. We will confirm that Susan Manning was born in this country as quickly as possible.  At that point, I will seek to update the Bradley Manning wikipedia article, backed up with the proper evidence, and we will be able to put this issue to bed once and for all.

Big thanks to @danhind who was indispensable in putting this together.

Update

It has been brought to my attention that, under Section 3(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981, even the children of those who are British citizens “by descent” may be able to claim citizenship. The relevant clauses are published on the UK Border Agency website:

A child will have an entitlement to be registered under section 3(2) of the British Nationality Act 1981 if:
they were born outside the United Kingdom; or
they were born after 21 May 2002 outside any of the British overseas territories; and
they were born to parents, one or both of whom are British citizens by descent; and
the parent who is British by descent was born to a parent (the child’s grandparent) who was a British citizen otherwise than by descent (or would have been but for their death); and
the parent who is British by descent lived in the United Kingdom at any time before the child’s birth for a continuous period of three years*; and
during the period they were living in the United Kingdom the parent was not absent for more than 270 days; and
the application is made before the child’s 18th birthday.

The case is very nearly closed.

NEXT STOP: Why this matters


    • #Bradley Manning
    • #Britain
  • 2 years ago
  • 3
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

U.S., British Govts Keep Pressure on WikiLeaks

U.S. and British government officials have begun a global crackdown against pro-WikiLeaks “hacktivists” who briefly shut down Mastercard, Visa, Paypal and Amazon.com December 9. The loose group of hacktivists began a global cyber-attack called “Operation Payback” against the companies that earlier had caved-in to what was likely a U.S. federal government pressure campaign and similar electronic attack against the WikiLeaks website earlier in the year.
via thenewamerican.com

    • #Britain
    • #USA
    • #Wiki Witch Hunt
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

If Chilcot is our finest inquisitor, thank heavens for WikiLeaks | Henry Porter | Comment is free | The Observer

Tony Blair’s evasions at the Chilcot inquiry continue to be an insult to the British public
via guardian.co.uk

    • #Britain
    • #Iraq
    • #Tony Blair
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Wikileaks and UKUncut have corporate Britain “running scared”

[Photo: Rex]

British PR agencies are making senior hires to strengthen their corporate reputation offerings as blue-chip clients come under threat from aggressive campaigning.

Weber Shandwick has poached Hill & Knowlton’s EMEA corporate practice leader Jim Donaldson to act in a newly created post as executive vice-president corporate comms, EMEA.

At the same time, Hanover has poached Football League director of comms Gavin Megaw to head up a corporate comms division, with the aim of building it to a £2m business. Megaw is a former head of crisis management at Fleishman-Hillard. Hanover’s new division will focus on the healthcare, energy, financial services, telecoms and media sectors.

The two hires follow increasingly aggressive campaigns by groups such as UK Uncut, which is targeting alleged tax avoiders.

The organisation has become well-known for its successful use of social media to co-ordinate protests on high streets across the UK. The group has listed its targets as Vodafone, Arcadia Group, HSBC, Grolsch, HMV, Boots, Barclays and KPMG.

Hanover MD Charles Lewington said he was responding to a growing requirement for ‘early warning software, analysts to interpret, first-class consultants to advise on responses and policy specialists to provide counsel on the political fall-out’.

Meanwhile, corporates are also said to be watching out for Wikileaks targeting them. Founder Julian Assange told Forbes magazine in November he is sitting on secret documents relating to the private sector.

One senior agency source told PRWeek that boardrooms across the UK were fearful of web-based organisations such as Wikileaks and UKUncut. ‘A lot of corporate Britain is running scared,’ said the source.

A number of experienced corporate PR professionals backed up this assertion.

Chatsworth CEO Nick Murray-Leslie said: ‘Financial risk and exposure has dominated the agenda of the c-suite for the past couple of years. Reputitional risk is now in the ascendency.
 
‘What makes Wikileaks so dangerous? Quite simply, because it has changed everything. It has opened an extended risk front to the business world, that of almost instant, global reputational risk.

‘The organisation has successfully appropriated a name which is similar to one of the most popular free source information sites available – Wikipedia -  which has delivered it almost immediate brand credibility and acceptance.

Murray-Leslie said companies should respond by monitoring employee sentiment and engaging in dialogue. He added: ‘Not being evil helps but if you can’t do that, prepare, prepare, prepare. Reform and culture change can often be better than legal recourse.’

Hill & Knowlton MD of issues & crisis Tim Luckett agreed that the internet was making corporate reputations more vulnerable.

He said: ‘Fundamentally, the web not only exposes businesses to a far broader range of critics, but also makes it easier to bring them together. Add to that, the reputational legacy of such incidents via the Google Effect and there becomes a significant threat to your brand.

‘The way in which activists are mobilising has changed - these online organisations have increasing influence and subsequent offline power.

‘As for change, organisations must realise that such tactics are here to stay and consequently need to spend a proportionate amount of time and effort monitoring social media and taking part in the conversation with such groups to best shape and influence developments before it’s too late.’

Edelman head of digital Marshall Manson said that in the current climate trust and reputation had become just as important to purchase decision as product quality and price.

‘Businesses must reflect this in their comms, and indeed their behaviour,’ he said. ‘And agencies must reflect it in their offers and their advice.’

Corporate antagonisers

UK Uncut The grassroots organisation has held sit-down protests against firms it accuses of avoiding tax payments

Wikileaks Expected to turn on the private sector in 2011. Founder Julian Assange told Forbes in November he is sitting on secret documents relating to the private sector

Greenpeace The charity’s recent targets include Nestle in March 2010

via prweek.com
    • #Britain
    • #corporations
    • #upcoming releases
  • 2 years ago
  • 1
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

UK faces legal challenge from family of Bangladeshi allegedly tortured by ‘death squad’ | World news | The Guardian

Members of the Rapid Action Battalion Members of the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB) received British training in ‘investigative interviewing techniques’. Photograph: Abir Abdullah/EPA

The British government faces a legal challenge over allegations it was complicit in the torture of Bangladeshi MP Salauddin Chowdhury, who was arrested by the country’s security forces earlier this month.

Lawyers acting for the 63-year-old’s family claim the training provided by British forces to Bangladesh’s Rapid Action Battalion [RAB], which arrested Chowdury, places the UK in breach of its obligations under international law.

RAB members have been held responsible for hundreds of extrajudicial killings since the unit was established in 2004. The unit itself admits to being responsible for more than 600 deaths, which it euphemistically attributes to “crossfire”.

Details of British support for RAB were revealed in US embassy cables released by WikiLeaks and reported by the Guardian. They show that Britain has been providing training in “investigative interviewing techniques” and “rules of engagement”.

According to Amnesty International, Chowdury was detained and tortured by RAB officers and Bangladeshi intelligence officials at an apartment in the Banani district of Dhaka on 16 December. His captors are alleged to have brought with them a number of torture implements and a doctor, who is alleged to have revived him three times after he lost consciousnes. The mistreatment is said to have included applying electrodes to his genitals, beating him, slitting his stomach with razors and twisting his toenails and fingernails with pliers.

According to Amnesty, Chowdury was initially arrested for questioning over an arson attack in which a person died, and was then reported to have been charged with offences allegedly committed during Bangladesh’s 1971 war of independence. He is now being held in prison in Bangladesh.

Today his son, Fayyaz Chowdury, called on the British government to intervene.

“The UK government is up to its neck in this case having provided practical and financial support to RAB who are responsible for my father’s ill-treatment. I am a British national and they must now intervene to secure my father’s immediate release from prison and a binding undertaking from the Bangladesh government that he will not be subjected to any further torture and ill-treatment or a patently unfair trial.”

The Foreign Office has defended the training offered to RAB as “fully in line with our laws and our values”. A spokesman sought to suggest it was providing only “human rights training” for RAB, although RAB’s head of training told the Guardian he was unaware of any human rights training since he was appointed last June.

Phil Shiner, of Public Interest Lawyers, which is bringing the legal challenge on behalf of Fayyaz Chowdury said: “The UK government owe the clearest of international obligations to my client, a British citizen, in circumstances where they are complicit in the torture of people like Mr Salauddin Chowdury. These obligations reflect international law principles that prohibit states from aiding and assisting other states in international crimes such as torture and extrajudicial executions. The UK government must use all means at their disposal to secure the immediate release of my client’s father and to ensure that he cannot face a kangaroo court for war crimes that he did not commit.”

via guardian.co.uk
    • #Bangladesh
    • #Britain
    • #death squads
    • #law
    • #torture
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Crowdleak: Breakthrough in Litvinenko case

In November 2006 Alexander Litvinenko was fatally poisoned with radioactive Polonium-210 in London. Alexander Litvinenko was a former Russian secret service agent, writer, dissident and public critic of the Russian secret service. He was best known as the author of “Blowing Up Russia: Terror From Within” and “Lubyanka Criminal Group.” According to 09MADRID869, Litvinenko also tipped off Spanish security officials on the locations, roles, and activities of several “Russian” mafia figures with ties to Spain.

After his death there has been a multitude of theories of what happened in the media. Most of them accused Russia of the murder.

In Cable 06PARIS7904 Hofmann reports on a meeting between Russia and the US on counter-terrorism. The Presidential Representative Safonov points out that “Russian authorities in London had known about and followed individuals moving radioactive substances into the city but were told by the British that they were under control before the poisoning took place.”

The result shows, that they were not under control. Why didn’t the UK stop people smuggling radioactive material into London? Or at least, watch such individuals closely enough so that something like this could not happen? Instead, the UK calls the Russian authorities back, who might have been able to foil the assassination. This could be interpreted as support for the murderers of Litvinenko. Be that as it may, as it stands, the UK is directly or indirectly responsible for the death of Alexander Litvinenko.

On 20 January 2007, British police announced it identified Andrey Lugovoy as the assassin. Two months later, the British Foreign Office officially submitted a request to the Government of Russia for the extradition of Lugovoi to face criminal charges in the UK.

Russian authorities have formally refused to extradite Andrei Lugovoy. 07MOSCOW2429, reveals there are constitutional and other legal prohibitions against the extradition of Russian citizens. The GOR is highly unlikely to extradite former FSB officer Andrey Lugovoy to Britain, citing constitutional and other legal prohibitions against the extradition of Russian citizens. Instead they offered to put Mr. Lugovoy on trial in Russia if the evidence is forwarded to them. In 07MOSCOW4599, we see that one protective measure the Kremlin had taken was to add him as the number two position on the Liberal Democratic Party of Russia’s ticket.

A few opposition voices called for Lugovoy to voluntarily submit to British justice. The British Embassy expects a further worsening in the UK-Russia and EU-Russia relationships.

Repercussions of the Litvinenko case are discussed in 08LONDON2643 and 08LONDON1837. Aldred said the cost of the fall-out to HMG from the Litvinenko issue was an end to close cooperation with Russian intelligence (FSB) on counterterrorism and other global issues. Brown and Medvedev made little progress on the issue of diplomatic visas, which are still being restricted by both countries as part of the fall-out from the Litvinenko case. Overall, the UK has had more experience lately than most western European countries with Moscow’s ire.

Lugovoy’s response to the allegations has been recorded in a Press conference of Dmitry Kovtun and Andrey Lugovoy. It reads:

Independent (UK newspaper): Did you murder Aleksandr Litvinenko?
Andrey Lugovoy: As for your question on whether I murdered Litvinenko: I unambiguously and with open eyes and face answer negatively. I have not murdered him. But unfortunately, the public in the UK still fails to grasp that. It’s quite clear that within the last 10 months a certain public opinion has developed in the UK and abroad on my involvement in the murder of Litvinenko, on the involvement of the special services and Russia as a whole. Simultaneously, none of the UK media tried to make its own investigation, to probe the issue of the selling of UK citizenship. I insist that UK citizenship was traded like finery on the market, and you’ve stood by calmly and observed it.

Since the allegations were made in 2007, there has yet to be a trial in the UK or in Russia.

via crowdleak.net
    • #Alexander Litvinenko
    • #Andrei Lugovoy
    • #Britain
    • #murder
    • #Russia
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

2010-12-08: WikiLeaks events and protests [Update 2] | WL Central

Image

AUSTRALIA: Discussion: Julian Assange, Law & Politics

Melbourne: A meeting to discuss Wikileaks’ Julian Assange’s legal and political position
Speakers: Julian Burnside AO QC, Peter Gordon, John Faine and Professor Spencer Zifcak
Date: Thursday 9 December 2010
Time: 5:30pm
Venue: the Law Institute of Victoria, 470 Bourke St, Melbourne
Details: http://www.law.monash.edu.au/castancentre/events/index.html

AUSTRALIA: National rallies to defend Julian Assange and WikiLeaks

Sydney: Friday, December 10, 1pm at Sydney Town Hall. Media contacts: Antony Loewenstein 0402 893 690; Simon Butler 0421 231 011. Rally information: Kylie Gilbert 0451 827 693
Event page: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=161656067211736

Melbourne: Friday, December 10, 4:30pm at the State Library Lawns, Melbourne. Contact: Vashti Jane 0423 407 910.
Event page: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=182297491780623

Brisbane: Thursday, December 9, 5.30pm Brisbane Square CBD & Friday, December 10, 12 noon at the Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade, 295 Anne Street, Brisbane CBD. (For December 10 action) Rally information: Liam Hanlon 0435 266 613. Media contact: Jim McIlroy 0423 741 734
Event page (December 9): http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=153885131325141

Hobart: Saturday, December 11, noon at the Hobart Parliament Lawns
Event page: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#%21/event.php?eid=171620612868329

Adelaide: Sunday, December 12, 1:00pm at Parliament House.
Event page: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=182236928453862

UNITED KINGDOM: London Demo for WikiLeaks and Julian Assange

London: Saturday, December 11: 11:00am - 6:00pm Location “Cumberland Gate” at Marble Arch Hyde Park. Nearest tube station - Marble Arch
Event page: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=175481195812657

UNITED STATES: Peace Community Redoubles Demand for End to Wars and Voices Support for Whistleblowers

Washington, DC: In front of the White House, Thursday, December 16, 10:00am
Event details: http://www.zcommunications.org/with-wikileaks-revelations-peace-communit…

GERMANY: Demonstration in support of WikiLeaks

Hamburg: Saturday, December 11, 11:00am - 6:00pm
Location: To be announced
Event page: http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=112899808778406

WikiLeaks protest group on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/WikiLeaks-Protests/146607388723655?v=wall

Are you organizing an event? Please contact us at admin@wlcentral.org and we will be happy to promote it!

(Image Credit: Dali Rau)

‹ 2010-12-08: WikiLeaks Statement: “We will not be gagged” up 2010-12-10: WikiLeaks support rally in Sydney this Friday [Update 1] ›
via wlcentral.org
    • #Australia
    • #Britain
    • #events
    • #Germany
    • #protests
    • #USA
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Cablegate Link Dump #6

CABLES INVOLVING GREAT BRITAIN

• The British Foreign Office misled parliament over the plight of thousands of islanders who were expelled from their Indian Ocean homeland – the British colony of Diego Garcia – to make way for a large US military base, according to secret US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks. It has privately admitted its latest plan to declare the islands the world’s largest marine protection zone will end any chance of them being repatriated. Publicly ministers have claimed the proposed park would have no effect on the islanders’ right of return.

• American officials dismissed British protests about secret US spy flights taking place from the UK’s Cyprus airbase, amid concerns from Labour ministers, upset about rendition flights going on behind their backs, that the UK would be an unwitting accomplice to torture.

• The cables reveal Washington’s opinion on Gordon Brown’s potential successors. David Miliband was deemed “too brainy”, Alan Johnson had a “lack of killer instinct” and Harriet Harman was a “policy lightweight but an adept interparty operator”.

• Gordon Brown was written off as prime minister by the US embassy in London a year into his premiership. It concluded that an “abysmal track record” had left him lurching from “political disaster to disaster”, according to cables released by WikiLeaks. He briefly earned some praise when he led the recapitalising of banks after the collapse of Lehman Brothers but within months his government was deemed a “sinking ship”. Brown’s international initiatives, from food summits to global disarmament and a UK national security council, were treated with indifference bordering on disdain by the Americans, according to US embassy cables.

 

    • #Britain
    • #Diego Garcia
    • #Gordon Brown
    • #Rendition
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Cablegate Link Dump #3

  • The Madrid Cables—By Scott Horton (Harper’s Magazine)
  • WikiLeaks cables: Secret deal let Americans sidestep cluster bomb ban | World news | The Guardian
    Officials concealed from parliament how US is allowed to bring weapons on to British soil in defiance of treaty
  • Photo Gallery: How the US Sees Select World Politicians - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International
  • WikiLeaked Cable Confirms U.S.’ Secret Somalia Op | Danger Room | Wired.com
  • Let’s Stop Panicking Over Half-Assed Terrorists Already | Danger Room | Wired.com
  • WikiLeaks Hasn’t Broken U.S. Intelligence. Yet. | Danger Room | Wired.com
  • Did US Special Operations Forces Want to “Target” Refugee Camps in Pakistan? | CommonDreams.org
  • WikiLeak: Pakistanis ‘Sabotage’ U.S. Mercs, Gear, Diplos | Danger Room | Wired.com

    • #Britain
    • #Spain
    • #cluster bombs
    • #banned weapons
    • #photos
    • #Somalia
    • #Ethiopia
    • #Pakistan
    • #cablegate links
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Cablegate Link Dump #2

  • SUBJECT: ISRAEL, A PROMISED LAND FOR ORGANISED CRIME?
  • WikiLeaks disclosures reveal U.S. frustration with Russian corruption - CNN.com
    with video of the Larry King interview with Putin.
  • The Hindu Business Line : WikiLeaks memo stirs up central bank controversy in UK
  • WikiLeaks cables: UK on constant alert to Russian espionage | World news | guardian.co.uk
  • WikiLeaks US embassy cables: live updates | News | guardian.co.uk
  • US embassy cables: Foreign Office says Miliband’s concern for Sri Lanka humanitarian crisis driven by UK electoral calculations | World news | guardian.co.uk
  • wikileaks.org on reddit.com - People are posting links to what they have found in the Cables for discussion on reddit. Some interesting finds.
  • 2010-12-02: WikiLeaks and the US Espionage Act: legal opinions | WL Central

Source: cablegate.wikileaks.org

    • #Israel
    • #cablegate links
    • #Russia
    • #corruption
    • #britain
    • #Banks
    • #Sri Lanka
    • #reddit
    • #law
    • #WLCentral.org
  • 2 years ago
  • 1
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

MI6 has nothing to do with torture, says chief - UK Politics, UK - The Independent

MI6 does not pass on intelligence to foreign agencies if it believes that it could result in torture, even if it could prevent terrorist activity taking place, the head of the service said today.

In the first public speech by a serving Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), as MI6 officially known, Sir John Sawers strongly defended its methods while appealing for understanding for the “real, constant, operational dilemmas” it faced.

    • #Britain
    • #torture
    • #The Independent
    • #MI6
    • #Julian Assange
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Documents leaked by WikiLeaks seen by lawyers, rights groups as possible legal treasure trove

LONDON - It has been one of the most bitter legal debates during the so-called war on terror — who’s to blame for torture and how many degrees of separation are needed to dodge a lawsuit?

The answer may lie in recently leaked documents, which lawyers and human rights groups hope will be a treasure trove of evidence that could prove U.S. and other coalition forces broke a cardinal rule of international law — handing over terror suspects when they had good reason to believe the detainees would be tortured.

    • #law
    • #britain
  • 2 years ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Page 2 of 3
← Newer • Older →

About

Sometimes things go wrong and posts don't appear, so you can check on Wikileaks Tsunami (posterous) blog if you think posts are not appearing. Afghan & Iraq War Logs Coverage

Warlogs

Tweet

Humanitarian News - All posts

↑ Grab this Headline Animator


    my links on trunk.ly


    Sidhe's other tumblr

    Pages

    • Links
    • Tags
    • About Wikileaks
    • About This Blog

    Twitter

    loading tweets…

    • RSS
    • Random
    • Archive
    • Questions?
    • Submissions?
    • Mobile
    Effector Theme by Pixel Union